• Eur. J. Clin. Invest. · Jan 2025

    Prognostic scores in patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation: An external validation study.

    • Consuelo Fernández-Avilés, Martín Ruiz Ortiz, Ana Fernández Ruiz, Gloria Heredia Campos, Adriana Resúa Collazo, Rafael González-Manzanares, Mónica Delgado Ortega, Ana Rodríguez Almodóvar, Fátima Esteban Martínez, Luis Carlos Maestre Luque, Alberto Morán Salinas, Alberto Torres Zamudio, Javier Herrera Flores, Manuel Díaz Andrade, José López Aguilera, Manuel Anguita Sánchez, Manuel Pan Álvarez-Osorio, and Dolores Mesa Rubio.
    • Cardiology Department, University Hospital Reina Sofia, Córdoba, Spain.
    • Eur. J. Clin. Invest. 2025 Jan 10: e14379e14379.

    BackgroundFour scores have been published in 2022 for assessing mortality risk of patients with tricuspid regurgitation (TR): the TRI-SCORE, those reported by Hochstadt and Wang and the TRIO score. Our objective was to perform an external validation of available scores for predicting mortality and the combined endpoint of mortality and heart failure (HF) admission, in an independent cohort of patients with severe TR and to compare their discriminative ability.MethodsDiscriminative ability of the scores for predicting events was assessed by means of receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves.ResultsThe validation cohort retrospectively included 614 consecutive patients (69 ± 13 years, 72% women) with severe TR studied with echocardiography in a tertiary care hospital and followed for up to 14 years (median 5 years, p25-75 2-7 years), with 358 deaths and 620 HF admissions on follow-up. Discriminative abilities for predicting death (C-statistic .72 [95% CI .68-.76] for the TRI-SCORE; .75 [.71-.78] for the Hochstadt score; .72 [.68-.76] for the Wang score; and .74 [.70-.78] for the TRIO score, p < .0005 for all) or the combined endpoint (C-statistic .74 [.70-.78]; .74 [.70-.78], .73 [.69-.77] and .76 [.72-.80], respectively, p < .0005 for all) on follow-up were statistically significant for all of them. Paired comparisons among them for predicting both endpoints were all non-significant.ConclusionsAll tested scores showed significant and similar discriminative ability for predicting the combined endpoint of mortality or HF admission in this independent validation study of patients with severe TR.© 2025 Stichting European Society for Clinical Investigation Journal Foundation. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,694,794 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.