• Chest · Jan 2025

    Diagnostic Performance of the Modified Lung-RADS in a Tuberculosis-endemic Country: The Korean National Lung Cancer Screening Program.

    • Hyungjin Kim, Eunseo Jo, Jinseob Kim, Nayoung Lee, Jin Mo Goo, and Yeol Kim.
    • Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital and College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Korea.
    • Chest. 2025 Jan 28.

    BackgroundIn 2019, Korea initiated the world's first national low-dose computed tomography (CT) lung cancer screening (LCS) program, adapting the Lung CT Screening Reporting and Data System (Lung-RADS) to counteract the high false-positive rates driven by prevalent tuberculosis.Research QuestionDoes the modified Lung-RADS enhance screening specificity while maintaining sensitivity?Study Design And MethodsThis nationwide, retrospective, cohort study included high-risk current smokers aged 54 to 74 with at least 30 pack-years, participating in the national LCS program from 2019 to 2020. The modified Lung-RADS 1.0 introduced category 2b for nodules matching the size of categories 3 or 4 but showing benign features like granulomas and juxtapleural nodules, and enhanced details for category 4X. Lung cancer diagnosis rates within a year of screening and the diagnostic performance of the modified and original Lung-RADS were evaluated.ResultsAmong 152,918 participants (98.2% male; mean age, 61.7±5.3 years), lung cancer was diagnosed in 0.68% (1,047/152,918). There was a linear trend in cancer rates across Lung-RADS categories (P<0.001). Category 2b showed a higher cancer rate than category 2 (0.25% [45/18,120] vs. 0.14% [33/23,467]; P=0.01) but lower than category 3 (0.53% [37/7,009]; P=0.001). Category 4X had a cancer rate of 36.88% (416/1,128). The modified Lung-RADS demonstrated improved specificity (91.96% [139,664/151,871] vs. 80.06% [121,589/151,871]; P<0.001) compared to the original criteria. While sensitivity showed a modest decrease (81.9% [858/1,047] vs. 86.2% [903/1,047]; P<0.001), the modification substantially reduced the follow-up burden, decreasing the number of positive screenings needed to detect one cancer from 34.5 to 15.2. The positive predictive value improved significantly (2.90% [903/31,185] to 6.57% [858/13,065]; P<0.001), while the negative predictive value remained consistently high (modified: 99.86% [139,664/139,853] vs. original: 99.88% [121,589/121,733]; P=0.23).InterpretationKorea's modified Lung-RADS enhanced screening efficiency through improved specificity despite a small reduction in sensitivity.Clinical Trial RegistrationN/A.Copyright © 2025. Published by Elsevier Inc.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…