• F Goffinet, B Langer, B Carbonne, F Audibert, D Tardif, N Berkane, F Le Goueff, M Laville, and F Maillard.
• INSERM U 149, Paris.
• J Gynecol Obst Bio R. 1999 Feb 1;28(1):31-40.

ObjectiveTo evaluate the feasibility of intrapartum fetal pulse oximetry, the distribution of fetal oxygen saturation values, and the relation with the neonatal outcome in a population with an abnormal fetal heart rate (FHR).Study DesignA prospective multicenter observational study, from June 1994 to November 1995. Fetal oxygen saturation was continuously recorded using a Nellcor N-400 fetal pulse oximeter in case of abnormal FHR during labor. Simultaneous readings of fetal oxygen saturation and of fetal blood analysis (FBA) were obtained at inclusion and before birth. Feasibility, adverse effects, distribution of fetal oxygen saturation values and relation with neonatal outcome were assessed.Results74 patients were included. From 172 attempted sensor placements, the procedure was impossible in three cases and fetal oxygen saturation values were obtained in 164 cases (95.3%). Physicians considered sensor placement an easier task than FBA attempt (easy in 87.5% vs 78.9% for FBA, p = 0.03). The mean reliable signal time (+/- SD) was 64.7 +/- 32% during the first stage. There were no serious adverse effects in the study population. The mean fetal oxygen saturation during the first stage of labor was 42.2 +/- 8.0% (10th-90th centile range: 30-53%). Fetal oxygen saturation was significantly correlated with scalp pH (r = 0.29; p = 0.01) but not with neonatal umbilical artery pH or gas values. There was a significant association between a low fetal oxygen saturation (< 30%) and a poor neonatal condition.ConclusionThe feasibility of fetal pulse oximetry is satisfactory in clinical practice. It is easy to use and provides a fair rate of recorded values, even in a population with suspicion of fetal distress. A low fetal oxygen saturation is significantly associated with an abnormal neonatal outcome.

14 keywords...

hide…