• Resp Care · Nov 2010

    Comparative Study

    Quantitative analysis of acid-base disorders in patients with chronic respiratory failure in stable or unstable respiratory condition.

    • Claude Guérin, Pascale Nesme, Véronique Leray, Florent Wallet, Gael Bourdin, Frédérique Bayle, Michèle Germain, and Jean-Christophe Richard.
    • Service de Réanimation Médicale et d'Assistance Respiratoire, Hôpital de la Croix Rousse, 103 Grande Rue de la Croix Rousse, 69004 Lyon, France. claude.guerin@chu-lyon.fr
    • Resp Care. 2010 Nov 1;55(11):1453-63.

    BackgroundThe Stewart approach theorizes that plasma pH depends on P(aCO₂), the strong ion difference, and the plasma total concentration of non-volatile weak acids (A(tot)). The conventional approach measures standardized base excess, bicarbonate (HCO₃⁻), and the anion gap.ObjectiveTo describe acid-base disorders with the Stewart approach and the conventional approach in patients with chronic respiratory failure.MethodsThis was an observational prospective study in a medical intensive care unit and a pneumology ward of a university hospital. There were 128 patients included in the study, of which 14 had more than one admission, resulting in 145 admissions. These were allocated to 4 groups: stable respiratory condition and elevated HCO₃⁻ (Group 1, n = 23), stable respiratory condition and non-elevated HCO₃⁻ (Group 2, n = 41), unstable respiratory condition and elevated HCO₃⁻ (Group 3, n = 44), and unstable respiratory condition and non-elevated HCO₃⁻ (Group 4, n = 37). Elevated HCO₃⁻ was defined as ≥ 3 standard deviations higher than the mean value we found in 8 healthy volunteers. Measurements were taken on admission.ResultsIn groups 1, 2, 3, and 4, the respective mean ± SD values were: HCO₃⁻ 33 ± 3 mM, 26 ± 3 mM, 37 ± 4 mM, and 27 ± 3 mM (P < .001); strong ion difference 45 ± 3 mM, 38 ± 4 mM, 46 ± 4 mM, and 36 ± 4 mM (P < .001); and A(tot) 12 ± 1 mM, 12 ± 1 mM, 10 ± 1 mM, 10 ± 2 mM (P < .001). Non-respiratory disorders related to high strong ion difference were observed in 12% of patients with elevated HCO₃⁻, and in none of those with non-elevated HCO₃⁻ (P = .003). Non-respiratory disorders related to low strong ion difference were observed in 9% of patients with non-elevated HCO₃⁻, and in none of those with elevated HCO₃⁻ (P = .02). Hypoalbuminemia was common, especially in unstable patients (group 3, 66%; group 4, 65%). Normal standardized base excess (16%), HCO₃⁻ (28%), and anion gap (30%) values were common. The Stewart approach detected high effective strong ion difference in 13% of normal standardized base excess, and in 20% of normal anion gap corrected for albuminemia, and low effective strong ion difference in 22% of non-elevated HCO₃⁻.ConclusionsIn patients with chronic respiratory failure the acid-base pattern is complex, metabolic alkalosis is present in some patients with elevated HCO₃⁻, and metabolic acidosis is present in some with non-elevated HCO₃⁻. The diagnostic performance of the Stewart approach was better than that of the conventional approach, even when corrected anion gap was taken into account.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.