• Abdulkadir Atim, Atilla Ergin, Ercan Kurt, Yusuf Ozdemiroglu, and Erdal Guzeldemir.
• Department of Anesthesiology, Beytepe Military Hospital, Ankara 06835, Turkey. drkadiratim@yahoo.com
• J Clin Anesth. 2007 Dec 1;19(8):591-5.

Study ObjectivesTo compare the clinical effectiveness of two peripheral nerve block techniques combined with sciatic nerve block: sciatic psoas compartment (SPC) and sciatic femoral 3-in-1 (SF 3-in-1) block.DesignProspective, randomized study.SettingMilitary medical academy hospital.PatientsThirty-six ASA physical status I patients, aged 20 to 33 years, undergoing elective knee arthroscopy.InterventionsPatients having SPC block (n = 19) or SF 3-in-1 block (n = 17) received 40 mL of a mixture of solution containing 15 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine, 15 mL of 2.0% prilocaine, and 10 mL of 0.9% sodium chloride. In both groups, the sciatic nerve was blocked with 20 mL of the same solution. An intravenous bolus injection of fentanyl 0.1 mg was used if patients complained of pain.Measurements And Main ResultsNone of the patients in the SPC group experienced pain owing to the applied tourniquet during the operation, whereas 7 patients from the SF 3-in-1 group (41.2 %) reported tourniquet pain. All SF 3-in-1 group patients but only 5 patients (26.3 %) in the SPC group required fentanyl during the operation. In addition, 7 patients in the SF 3-in-1 group required second doses of fentanyl. Patient satisfaction was significantly higher in the SPC group than in the SF 3-in-1 block group (P < 0.0001).ConclusionsBoth SPC and SF 3-in-1 provided sufficient anesthetic efficacy for knee arthroscopy. However, SPC may be preferable to SF 3-in-1 block owing to better patient satisfaction and less requirement for opioid analgesics.

38 keywords...

hide…