• Osteoporos Int · Oct 2006

    Spinal cord injury causes more damage to bone mass, bone structure, biomechanical properties and bone metabolism than sciatic neurectomy in young rats.

    • S-D Jiang, L-S Jiang, and L-Y Dai.
    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
    • Osteoporos Int. 2006 Oct 1;17(10):1552-61.

    IntroductionAlthough both spinal cord injury (SCI) and sciatic neurectomy (NX) can cause osteopaenia in young rats, the effects of these two injuries on cortical and cancellous bone may differ. The objective of this study was to compare the effects of SCI and NX on bone weight, bone material property, bone mass, bone geometry, trabecular microarchitecture, mechanical strength and bone turnover in young rats.Materials And MethodsThirty six-week-old male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomised into three groups (10 per group): SCI, bilateral sciatic NX and untreated control (CON). All rats were killed on day 21. Bone mineral density (BMD) was studied using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). At death, the right proximal tibial metaphysis and the fourth lumbar vertebra were examined for bone structural geometric analysis by micro-computed tomography (CT) and then processed for histomorphometry to assess bone cell activity. Serum N-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (NTX) and osteocalcin (OC) levels were analysed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Biomechanical strength properties of the femur and humerus were measured by three-point bending, and the third lumbar vertebra and the proximal end of tibia were tested by compression.ResultsBMD in the sublesional areas of SCI rats was significantly lower than that of NX rats (proximal tibia, 0.176+/-0.018 g/cm(2) vs. 0.224+/-0.015 g/cm(2), P<0.001). Bone volume (BV/TV), trabecular number (Tb.N) and thickness (Tb.Th) in the tibial second spongiosa of SCI rats were significantly less than those in NX rats (BV/TV: 7.15+/-1.18% vs. 12.32+/-1.83%, P<0.001; Tb.N: 1.23+/-0.22 vs. 2.38+/-0.45, P<0.001; Tb.Th: 33.73+/-5.15 microm vs. 42.80+/-7.44 microm, P<0.01) and trabecular separation (Tb.Sp: 1,053.37+/-164.24 microm vs. 748.32+/-129.36 microm, P<0.01) was significantly greater than in NX rats. Furthermore, poorer trabecular connectivity was found in SCI rats than in NX rats (number of nodes, N.Nd/TV: 1.04+/-0.09 vs. 3.29+/-0.53; number of terminus, N.Tm/TV: 28.53+/-3.17 vs. 21.64+/-2.31, P<0.01). The bone formation rate of the tibial second spongiosa in SCI rats was significantly higher than in NX rats (2.06+/-0.13 vs. 1.53+/-0.09, P<0.001) and, also, the eroded surface in SCI rats was significantly higher than in NX rats (13.42+/-1.24 vs. 10.36+/-1.07, P<0.001). In addition, biomechanical tests showed that SCI rats had poorer biomechanical properties of the femur, proximal tibia and fourth lumbar vertebra than in NX rats. There were significantly higher levels of OC in SCI rats compared with NX rats (30.19+/-1.17 vs. 21.15+/-1.76, P<0.001). Also, serum NTX levels were significantly higher than in NX rats (51.60+/-2.61 vs. 33.85+/-1.93, P<0.001).ConclusionSCI caused more damage to bone mass, bone structure, biomechanical properties and bone metabolism than NX in young rats. This suggests that different mechanisms may underlie osteopaenia following SCI and NX.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…