• Ruth Stalnikowicz, Riad Mahamid, Sigalit Kaspi, and Mayer Brezis.
• Emergency Department, Hadassah University Hospital Mount Scopus, PO Box 24035, Jerusalem 91240, Israel. darvasi@md.huji.ac.il
• Int J Qual Health Care. 2005 Apr 1;17(2):173-6.

ObjectiveEvaluation and improvement of pain management in our emergency department (ED).DesignThis was a "before-after" study. For each subject, the nurse, the physician, and the patient were asked to rate the initial intensity of the pain on a Visual Analogue Score (VAS). The timing and the type of analgesics administered were then recorded and follow-up VAS was performed.SettingA teaching, community-based, 400-bed hospital.Study Participants140 patients admitted for acute pain related to orthopedic injuries.Main Outcome MeasuresThe gap between the VAS expressed by the patient and estimated by the staff, the proportion of patients receiving analgesics, and the length of time delays between admission and analgesic administration.InterventionThe intervention included education of medical and nursing staffs, insertion of a VAS template in the patient's chart, initiation of routine VAS assessment and re-assessment, and implementation of a protocol for pain management with standing orders for nurses.ResultsThe VAS gap between the patient and the nurse decreased significantly from 1.91 2.04 to 1.03 1.97 after the intervention (P = 0.01). The percentage of patients receiving analgesics rose from 70 to 82% following the intervention. Time from admission to analgesia decreased from 80 +/- 68 min (mean +/- SD) before the intervention, to 58 +/- 37 min after the intervention (P = 0.05).ConclusionInadequate pain management in the ED appears related to poor staff assessment of pain and may be improved by routine VAS recording and by a nurse-based pain protocol.

32 keywords...

hide…