• Kaohsiung J Med Sci · Jan 2011

    Lumbar epidural space was narrower in parturients than that in nonpregnant women by ultrasound assessment.

    • I-Cheng Lu, Shu-Hung Huang, Chiung-Dan Hsu, Chin-Hsi Chiu, and Sheng-Hua Wu.
    • Department of Anesthesiology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
    • Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2011 Jan 1;27(1):20-4.

    AbstractLabor epidural is commonly used to provide both regional anesthesia and postoperative pain relief. Epidural space is supposed to be narrower and deeper in a parturient than that in a nonpregnant woman. The aim of this study was to explore the difference of epidural spaces between parturient and nonpregnant women by ultrasound assessment. Thirty nonpregnant female volunteers and 30 parturients undergoing labor epidurals were enrolled to receive ultrasound examination. A low-frequency (2-5 MHz) curved-array ultrasound probe was used to obtain spinal sonoanatomy for each subject. The longitudinal paramedian scanning plane was used to obtain optimal ultrasound image for spinal sonoanatomy. Primary outcome was evaluated by the diameter and depth of epidural space at three lumbar interspaces (from L2 to L5). The quality of ultrasound images was also compared between the groups by a numerical scoring system (from 0 to 3). The mean diameters of lumbar epidural spaces were 3.03 ± 0.45 mm and 4.44 ± 0.49 mm (p<0.05) for parturients and nonpregnant women, respectively. The mean depths of lumbar epidural spaces for parturients and nonpregnant women were 3.53 ± 0.62 cm and 3.25 ± 0.63 cm, respectively (p<0.05). The mean scores for epidural space image quality were 2.58 ± 0.58 and 2.63 ± 0.53 for parturients and nonpregnant women, respectively (p=0.08). Epidural space is narrower and deeper at lumbar interspaces in obstetrics by ultrasound examination. The quality of ultrasound images did not differ significantly between the groups. These quantitative results improve the understanding of the differences between two groups that have been previously known qualitatively and may help in avoiding complications.Copyright © 2011. Published by Elsevier B.V.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,694,794 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.