-
- Kathryn E Gaudette and S Jay Weaver.
- H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612-9497, USA. katiegaudette@hotmail.com
- Ann Pharmacother. 2003 Jul 1;37(7-8):1132-5.
ObjectiveTo compare the different sterility standards and the cost issues involved when choosing an opioid product for intraspinal administration.Data SourcesLiterature accessed through MEDLINE and other Internet search engines (September 2002-April 2003) was evaluated. Key search terms included epidural/intrathecal, opioids, sterility, and compounding.Data SynthesisIntraspinal use is prevalent in the area of pain management. Product selection is of utmost importance when administering through the intraspinal route. An evaluation of guidelines on sterility and a cost comparison were conducted.ConclusionsThe preservative-free commercially available products that are indicated for intrathecal/epidural use are the best alternative due to proper outside testing and stringent quality assurance. The generic morphine preservative-free product may also be considered if proper steps are taken to ensure that the final product is diluted properly.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.