• M H Ereth, G A Nuttall, P J Santrach, J T Klindworth, W C Oliver, and H V Schaff.
• Department of Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA. ereth.mark@mayo.edu
• Anesthesiology. 1998 Apr 1;88(4):962-9.

BackgroundPlatelet dysfunction is one of several major causes of bleeding after cardiopulmonary bypass. A timely, simple, point-of-care determinant of platelet function recently became available for clinical use. Adding platelet-activating factor to conventional activated clotting time methods (platelet-activated clotting test [PACT]) produces rapid results (<15 min) and may yield a measure of platelet responsiveness and whole-blood procoagulant activity.MethodsBlood samples were drawn from 100 patients after cardiac surgery on their arrival in the intensive care unit for PACT, platelet count, prothrombin time (PT), and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT). Cumulative blood loss at 4, 8, and 12 h after arrival in the intensive care unit and perioperative transfusion requirements were quantitated. Coagulation tests and mediastinal blood loss were compared using the Spearman rank test and Pearson correlation. The sensitivity and specificity of the laboratory tests for predicting blood loss were analyzed using the receiver operating characteristic method.ResultsThe PT was the only test that correlated with blood loss at 4, 8, and 12 h. The PACT did not correlate with blood loss at 4, 8, or 12 h, nor did the PACT correlate with the PT or the aPTT. The sensitivity and specificity of the PACT were less than those of the PT in predicting blood loss. Only the PT correlated with platelet and fresh frozen plasma transfusion.ConclusionsThe PT correlated with blood loss and transfusion requirements and was superior to PACT, aPTT, and platelet count for predicting excessive blood loss after cardiopulmonary bypass.

17 keywords...

hide…