• Arch Phys Med Rehabil · Nov 2013

    Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study

    Muscle energy technique versus corticosteroid injection for management of chronic lateral epicondylitis: randomized controlled trial with 1-year follow-up.

    • Sami Küçükşen, Halim Yilmaz, Ali Sallı, and Hatice Uğurlu.
    • Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Turkey. Electronic address: samikucuksen@hotmail.com.
    • Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Nov 1;94(11):2068-74.

    ObjectiveTo determine the short- and long-term effectiveness of the muscle energy technique (MET) compared with corticosteroid injections (CSIs) for chronic lateral epicondylitis (LE).DesignRandomized controlled trial with 1 year of follow-up.SettingOutpatient clinic of a university's department of physical medicine and rehabilitation.ParticipantsPatients with chronic LE (N=82; 45 women, 37 men).InterventionsEight sessions of MET, or a single CSI was applied.Main Outcome MeasuresGrip strength, pain intensity, and functional status were assessed using the pain-free grip strength (PFGS), a visual analog scale (VAS), and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, respectively. Measurements were performed before beginning treatment and at 6, 26, and 52 weeks afterward.ResultsWhen the baseline PFGS, VAS, and DASH scores were compared with the scores at the 52-week follow-up, statistically significant improvements were observed in both groups over time. The patients who received a CSI showed significantly better effects at 6 weeks according to the PFGS and VAS scores, but declined thereafter. At the 26- and 52-week follow-ups, the patients who received the MET were statistically significantly better in terms of grip strength and pain scores. At 52 weeks, the mean PFGS score in the MET group was significantly higher (75.08±26.19 vs 62.24±21.83; P=.007) and the mean VAS score was significantly lower (3.28±2.86 vs 4.95±2.36; P=.001) than those of the CSI group. Although improvements in the DASH scores were more pronounced in the MET group, the differences in DASH scores between the groups were not statistically significant.ConclusionsThis study showed that while both MET and CSI improved measures of strength, pain, and function compared with baseline, subjects receiving MET had better scores at 52 weeks for PFGS and the VAS for pain. We conclude that MET appears to be an effective intervention in the treatment of LE.Copyright © 2013 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,624,503 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.