• Daniel P Sulmasy and Johanna R Sood.
• John J. Conley Department of Ethics, St. Vincent's Manhattan, New York, New York 10011, USA. daniel_sulmasy@nymc.edu
• Med Care. 2003 Apr 1;41(4):458-66.

BackgroundLittle is known about the time health professionals spend with inpatients that are close to the end of life.Subjects And MethodsWe asked day-shift nurses to use a standardized log sheet to record how much time they spent in various categories of activity for 146 seriously ill medical inpatients with poor prognoses at 2 teaching hospitals.ResultsThe mean patient age was 68, and the mean APACHE-III physiology score 28; 59% were white, 56% were women, 41% had cancer or HIV, and 81% had do not resuscitate (DNR) orders. The mean amount of time nurses spent with patients per 12-hour day shift was 53 min. In bivariate analyses, sex, religion, diagnosis and insurance status were not associated with nursing bedside time. In an ANOVA model, patients with DNR orders received more time than those without DNR orders (56 vs. 39 min, P = 0.04), and white patients received more bedside time than nonwhites (57 vs. 46 min, P = 0.01), even after controlling for severity of illness and DNR status. Among the 47 mentally alert patients who could be interviewed, symptom severity, quality of care, and satisfaction ratings were not associated with nursing bedside time.ConclusionsIn this population, nurses spent less time with nonwhite patients and more time with patients with DNR orders. That patients with DNR orders received more time may be reassuring. However, further investigation will be required to confirm these results, to understand why nonwhite patients appear to have received less bedside nursing time, and to investigate further the relationship between time, satisfaction, and quality of care.

28 keywords...

hide…