• Ann Pharmacother · Jul 1993

    Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial

    Assessment of patient acceptance and inhalation technique of a pressurized aerosol inhaler and two breath-actuated devices.

    • C J Nimmo, D N Chen, S M Martinusen, T L Ustad, and D N Ostrow.
    • Department of Pharmacy, Vancouver General Hospital, BC, Canada.
    • Ann Pharmacother. 1993 Jul 1;27(7-8):922-7.

    ObjectiveTo assess inhalation technique in patients after written instruction alone, written and verbal instruction, and clinical use of two new inhalation devices.DesignRandomized, crossover evaluation of the albuterol Diskhaler and the terbutaline Turbuhaler.SettingCanadian tertiary-care hospital.PatientsTwenty hospitalized adults with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease currently using an albuterol metered-dose inhaler (MDI). Nineteen patients received Diskhaler, 16 received Turbuhaler, 15 received both inhalers, and 10 patients used both inhalers for three days each.InterventionsPatients were randomized to receive either Diskhaler or Turbuhaler for three days. Inhaler technique was assessed after written instruction, written plus verbal instruction, at the first scheduled dose after instruction, and after three days of clinical use. Patients remaining in the hospital after three days crossed over to the other study inhaler and the same protocol was followed.Main Outcome MeasuresPatient inhalation technique was assessed and compared for the MDI, Diskhaler, and Turbuhaler.ResultsAssessment of MDI technique revealed that 35 percent of patients used their MDI correctly on the first puff, and 42 percent used it correctly on the second puff. Following written instruction alone, correct technique was demonstrated by 32 percent of patients with Diskhaler and 6 percent with Turbuhaler. Technique significantly improved following verbal instruction, although 40 percent of the patients required up to three attempts to demonstrate correct technique on at least one of the study inhalers. After three days of clinical use, correct technique was demonstrated in only 54 percent of the Diskhaler and 64 percent of the Turbuhaler assessments. Performance at this assessment was, however, significantly better on the Turbuhaler than on the MDI (p = 0.01). Performance on the Diskhaler was not significantly different from the performance on the other inhalers.ConclusionsWritten instruction alone is inadequate in teaching correct inhalation technique. Verbal instruction and technique assessment are essential for patients to achieve proper technique. Patients may perform better on the Turbuhaler than on other inhalation devices.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.