• U Simeoni, V Lacroze, M Leclaire, and V Millet.
• Département de Néonatologie, Hôpital de La Timone-Enfants et Hôpital de la Conception, Assistance Publique, Hôpitaux de Marseille, 264, rue Saint-Pierre, 13385 Marseille. usimeoni@ap-hm.fr
• J Gynecol Obst Bio R. 2001 Oct 1;30(6 Suppl):S58-63.

AbstractHow far providing neonatal intensive care to extremely low birth weight infants is appropriate is still a highly controversial issue. Decision making when a poor prognosis has been established may be facilitated by consensus based recommendations and rigorous procedures. In the very majority of situations, the provision of intensive care is advocated at birth a priori. A decision of treatment withholding or withdrawal may eventually be made secondarily, in the case major neurological complications, likely to induce severe long term deficits, are evidenced. In any case, an ethical policy focused on each infant's best interest is justified, while the adoption of a systematic, gestational age or birth weight based restriction of access to intensive care may not be acceptable in most countries. Rigorous criteria must be fulfilled for end of life decision making and procedures. Continuous assistance to the patient and to the parents is key determinant.

13 keywords...

hide…