• J Clin Anesth · Aug 2005

    The usefulness of the modified laryngoscopic blade for training novice laryngoscopists.

    • Jaemin Lee, Byung Sam Kim, Hae Wone Chang, and Yoonki Lee.
    • Department of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Kangnam St. Mary's Hospital, Seoul 137-040, Republic of Korea.
    • J Clin Anesth. 2005 Aug 1;17(5):334-8.

    Study ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a modified Macintosh blade for reducing the chances of directly contacting the teeth and providing a satisfactory laryngoscopic view during laryngoscopies by novice laryngoscopists.DesignThis is a prospective clinical comparison study.SettingThe study took place at an operating room of a university hospital.PatientsSeventy-two patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical statuses I and II, aged 16 to 64 years, who were scheduled for elective surgery requiring general anesthesia with endotracheal tube placement participated in this study.InterventionsLaryngoscopy was performed twice on each patient, once with a regular Macintosh no. 3 blade and once with a blade in which the flange was partially removed.MeasurementsAs an indirect parameter for anticipating potential dental injury during laryngoscopy, the perpendicular distance from the tip of the maxillary central incisor to the flange of each blade (the blade-tooth distance) was measured when a novice laryngoscopist lifted up the laryngoscope and visualized the glottis. We compared the blade-tooth distances, the chances of directly contacting the tooth, laryngoscopic views, and the subjective feeling of difficulty in handling the laryngoscope between the 2 blades.Main ResultsBlade-tooth distance varied significantly between the 2 blades: the median/interquartile range was 1.2/2.3 mm vs 3.0/4.3 mm for the regular Macintosh no. 3 and the modified blade, respectively (P<.01). The modified blade was associated with decreased chances of directly contacting the teeth (P<.05). In addition, the modified blade provided a better laryngoscopic view than did the regular blade (P<.01). Most novice laryngoscopists felt that laryngoscopy with the modified blade was significantly easier than that with the regular Macintosh blade (P<.01).ConclusionsThe modified Macintosh blade used in this study proved to be a useful device for training novice laryngoscopists with respect to procedure effectiveness and patient safety.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…