• Teresa A Volsko, Kathy Fedor, Jason Amadei, and Robert L Chatburn.
• Children's Hospital Medical Center of Akron, Akron, OH, USA. tvolsko@chmca.org
• Resp Care. 2011 Dec 1; 56 (12): 1893-900.

BackgroundLimited data are available to describe the CPAP effects that can be expected when using high flow with a traditional nasal cannula.ObjectiveTo describe the relationship between the pressure generated at the airway opening and flow through a nasal cannula using a simulated infant model. We hypothesized that positive pressure generated by a standard cannula at flows > 2 L/min would be minimal and clinically unimportant.MethodsNares were simulated with holes drilled in a plastic fixture. A nares template for CPAP prongs served as a sizing template for the holes. Small, medium, and large nares fixtures were constructed and connected to a lung simulator that simulated spontaneous breathing. Respiratory muscle pressure was simulated by setting a waveform and adjusting the amplitude to deliver a range of tidal volumes (V(T)) from 3 mL to 12 mL. Lung compliance and resistance were set at 0.5 mL/cm H(2)O and 125 cm H(2)O/L/s, respectively. Nasal cannulas were inserted in the model nares. We assured that the prong occlusion of the nares did not exceed 50%. Cannula flow was adjusted from 2-6 L/min in 1-L/min increments. Data were averaged over 20 breaths. Mean airway pressure and percent change in V(T) were recorded.ResultsThe greatest effect on V(T) (mean ± SD 0.16 ± 0.10 mL) and pressure change (mean ± SD 0.7 ± 0.5 cm H(2)O) occurred with the premature cannula. The least effect on pressure (mean ± SD 0.3 ± 0.22 cm H(2)O) and V(T) change (mean ± SD 0.01 ± 0.02 mL) occurred with the infant cannula.ConclusionsClinically important pressures were not generated by high flows with a standard nasal cannula. The differences in spontaneous V(T) across all flows were negligible.

15 keywords...

hide…