• John G Heller, Rick C Sasso, Stephen M Papadopoulos, Paul A Anderson, Richard G Fessler, Robert J Hacker, Domagoj Coric, Joseph C Cauthen, and Daniel K Riew.
• Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, The Emory Spine Center, Atlanta, GA, USA. john.heller@emoryhealthcare.or
• Spine. 2009 Jan 15;34(2):101-7.

Study DesignA prospective, randomized, multicenter study of surgical treatment of cervical disc disease.ObjectiveTo assess the safety and efficacy of cervical disc arthroplasty using a new arthroplasty device at 24-months follow-up.Summary Of Background DataCervical disc arthroplasty preserves motion in the cervical spine. It is an alternative to fusion after neurologic decompression, whereas anterior decompression and fusion provides a rigorous comparative benchmark of success.MethodsWe conducted a randomized controlled multicenter clinical trial enrolling patients with cervical disc disease. Ultimately 242 received the investigational device (Bryan Cervical Disc), and 221 patients underwent a single-level anterior cervical discectomy and decompression and fusion as a control group. Patients completed clinical and radiographic follow-up examinations at regular intervals for 2 years after surgery.ResultsAnalysis of 12- and 24-month postoperative data showed improvement in all clinical outcome measures for both groups; however, 24 months after surgery, the investigational group patients treated with the artificial disc had a statistically greater improvement in the primary outcome variables: Neck disability index score (P = 0.025) and overall success (P = 0.010). With regard to implant- or implant/surgical-procedure-associated serious adverse events, the investigational group had a rate of 1.7% and the control group, 3.2%. There was no statistical difference between the 2 groups with regard to the rate of secondary surgical procedures performed subsequent to the index procedure. Patients who received the artificial cervical disc returned to work nearly 2 weeks earlier than the fusion patients (P = 0.015).ConclusionTwo-year follow-up results indicate that cervical disc arthroplasty is a viable alternative to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in patients with persistently symptomatic, single-level cervical disc disease.

36 keywords...

hide…