• Pediatr Crit Care Me · Jul 2008

    Theory and in vitro validation of a new extracorporeal arteriovenous loop approach for hemodynamic assessment in pediatric and neonatal intensive care unit patients.

    • Nikolai M Krivitski, Victor V Kislukhin, and Naveen V Thuramalla.
    • Transonic Systems Inc., Ithaca, NY, USA. nikolai.krivitski@transonic.com
    • Pediatr Crit Care Me. 2008 Jul 1;9(4):423-8.

    ObjectivesNo simple method exists for repeatedly measuring cardiac output in intensive care pediatric and neonatal patients. The purpose of this study is to present the theory and examine the in vitro accuracy of a new ultrasound dilution cardiac output measurement technology in which an extracorporeal arteriovenous tubing loop is inserted between existing arterial and venous catheters.DesignLaboratory experiments.SettingResearch laboratory.SubjectsNone.InterventionsNone.Measurements And Main ResultsIn vitro validations of cardiac output, central blood volume, total end-diastolic volume, and active circulation volume were performed in a model mimicking pediatric (children 2-10 kg) and neonatal (0.5-3 kg) flows and volumes against flows and volumes measured volumetrically. Reusable sensors were clamped onto the arterial and venous limbs of the arteriovenous loop. A peristaltic pump was used to circulate liquid at 6-12 mL/min from the artery to the vein through the arteriovenous loop. Body temperature injections of isotonic saline (0.3-10 mL) were performed. In the pediatric setting, the absolute difference between cardiac output measured by dilution and cardiac output measured volumetrically was 3.97% +/- 2.97% (range 212-1200 mL/min); for central blood volume the difference was 4.59% +/- 3.14% (range 59-315 mL); for total end-diastolic volume the difference was 4.10% +/- 3.08% (range 24-211 mL); and for active circulation volume the difference was 3.30% +/- 3.07% (range 247-645 mL). In the neonatal setting the difference for cardiac output was 4.40% +/- 4.09% (range 106-370 mL/min); for central blood volume the difference was 4.90% +/- 3.69% (range 50-62 mL); and for active circulation volume the difference was 5.39% +/- 4.42% (range 104-247 mL).ConclusionsIn vitro validation confirmed the ability of the ultrasound dilution technology to accurately measure small flows and volumes required for hemodynamic assessments in small pediatric and neonatal patients. Clinical studies are in progress to assess the reliability of this technology under different clinical situations.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.