• Resp Care · Jul 2008

    Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study

    Patient comfort during pressure support and volume controlled-continuous mandatory ventilation.

    • Alan D Betensley, Imran Khalid, John Crawford, Robert A Pensler, and Bruno DiGiovine.
    • Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, 2799 W Grand Boulevard, K-17, Detroit MI 48202, USA. abetens1@hfhs.org
    • Resp Care. 2008 Jul 1;53(7):897-902.

    BackgroundPressure-support ventilation (PSV) is more comfortable than volume controlled-continuous mandatory ventilation (VC-CMV) in acute hypercapnic respiratory failure, in patients undergoing noninvasive ventilation. Physiologic measurements of patient status have been compared in PSV and VC-CMV in endotracheally intubated patients, but patient perception of comfort has not been measured in this population.ObjectiveTo determine if PSV is more comfortable than VC-CMV (volume-cycled, flow-limited) in intubated mechanically ventilated patients.MethodsIn a randomized prospective trial, patients underwent PSV and VC-CMV for 30 min each, separated by a 30 min washout with the baseline ventilation mode (pressure-regulated volume-control ventilation [PRVC]). The level of pressure support was set as the plateau pressure on VC-CMV with a tidal volume of 8 mL/kg minus the end-expiratory pressure. After each mode the patient was asked to mark his or her comfort level on a visual analog scale.ResultsEleven of the 14 patients were more comfortable during PSV. The baseline mean comfort score (during PRVC) was 62 +/- 18 (95% confidence interval 51.7-72.5). The mean comfort score for PSV was 83 +/- 11 (95% confidence interval 76.9-89.6). The mean comfort score for VC-CMV was 70 +/- 18 (95% confidence interval 59.4-79.9). PSV was significantly more comfortable than VC-CMV (p = 0.02) or PRVC (p = 0.009), whereas the comfort scores for VC-CMV and PRVC were not significantly different (p = 0.278). Respiratory rate, blood pressure, heart rate, minute ventilation, and blood oxygen saturation showed no difference between PRVC, VC-CMV, and PSV.ConclusionsOn average the patients felt more comfortable during PSV than during VC-CMV or PRVC, so PSV may be the preferred mode for awake intubated patients.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.