• A E Russell, L M Wing, S A Smith, P E Aylward, R J McRitchie, R M Hassam, M J West, and J P Chalmers.
• Department of Medicine, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, South Australia.
• J. Hypertens. 1989 Aug 1;7(8):607-13.

AbstractThis study tested the hypothesis that a sphygmomanometer cuff bladder long enough to encircle the arm in most adults ('obese cuff') would provide a more accurate and precise estimate of intra-arterial pressure than the usual 'standard' cuff bladder. In 53 patients undergoing diagnostic coronary angiography (35 males, 18 females, aged 36-79 years), indirect blood pressure, measured in the left arm with a random-zero sphygmomanometer, was compared with simultaneously measured femoral intra-arterial pressure. Duplicate indirect measurements were made with each of two cuffs containing bladders measuring 39 x 15 cm ('obese') and 23 x 12 cm ('standard'). The obese cuff bladder encircled 80% or more of the arm circumference in all subjects, whereas the standard cuff bladder met this requirement in only 19% of the subjects. For both systolic and diastolic pressure there was marked interindividual variability in the differences between indirect and direct measurements with both cuffs. With the obese cuff there was no systematic error in the diastolic blood pressure measurement. The standard cuff consistently overestimated diastolic pressure by 7.7 +/- 8.3 mmHg (mean +/- s.d.). For both cuffs, the difference between indirect and direct diastolic pressure increased with arm size (P less than 0.05). Both cuffs underestimated systolic blood pressure, the obese cuff by 15.5 +/- 11.7 mmHg and the standard cuff by 7.6 +/- 12.1 mmHg. These systolic blood pressure underestimates were greater at higher blood pressures (P less than 0.01) and with smaller arms (P less than 0.05). Age was not related to measurement error with either cuff.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

15 keywords...

hide…