• J Clin Anesth · Mar 1997

    Comparative Study Clinical Trial

    A comparison of propofol and remifentanil during monitored anesthesia care.

    • I Smith, M N Avramov, and P F White.
    • Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, University of Texas South-western Medical Center at Dallas 75235-9068, USA.
    • J Clin Anesth. 1997 Mar 1;9(2):148-54.

    Study ObjectiveTo compare remifentanil, an esterase-metabolized opioid, to a standard propofol-based sedation technique for monitored anesthesia care (MAC).DesignNon-randomized, open label.SettingUniversity hospital.Patients44 healthy female outpatients undergoing breast biopsy procedures under local anesthesia.InterventionsAll patients received intravenous (IV) midazolam 2 mg, followed by a continuous infusion of either propofol 75 micrograms/kg/min, or remifentanil 0.1 microgram/kg/min, which was subsequently titrated to maintain optimal patient comfort without respiratory depression. Surgical-related pain was treated by injecting additional local anesthetic solution and "rescue" boluses of fentanyl 25 micrograms IV.Measurements And Main ResultsSedation, pain, and discomfort were monitored using standardized rating scales at 1 to 5 minute intervals. Recovery times were measured from the end of the study drug infusions. Propofol resulted in significantly higher median sedation scores compared with remifentanil, with 73% of patients requiring a decrease in the propofol infusion rate because of "excessive" sedation. Local anesthetic requirements, pain, and discomfort scores during surgery were similar in both groups. Remifentanil resulted in greater respiratory depression compared with propofol, with decreases in the remifentanil infusion rate required by 41% of patients because of a slow respiratory rate (< 8 bpm) and/or oxygen desaturation measured by pulse oximetry (SpO2 < 90%). Median times to ambulation and to being judged "fit for discharge" were significantly shorter following propofol (40 and 47 minutes, respectively) compared with remifentanil (52 and 58 minutes, respectively).ConclusionRemifentanil provided comparable intraoperative conditions and patient comfort at a lower sedation level compared with propofol. However, remifentanil was associated with greater respiratory depression and a longer time to home readiness.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…