-
- D J Hunter.
- Nuffield Institute for Health, University of Leeds, UK.
- Br. Med. Bull. 1995 Oct 1;51(4):876-84.
AbstractThe politics of rationing are messy and treacherous. As long as rationing remained implicit, politicians were shielded from the impact of decisions about who to treat and who not to treat. Explicit rationing changes all this by making the process of reaching choices more visible. However, implicit rationing may actually be a better way of dealing with difficult and complex issues. There is, nevertheless, scope for improving the process and making it more open and accountable. While efforts to terminate ineffective treatments are welcome and overdue, they are not a substitute for rationing. Finally, while politicians are being called upon to set national priorities and guidelines for rationing care, there is resistance to doing so when the decisions are so context specific and can only be made effectively at a micro level.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*,_underline_or**bold**. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>and subscript<sub>text</sub>. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3., hyphens-or asterisks*. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com) - Images can be included with:
 - For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote..