• Int J Qual Health Care · Dec 2015

    Pathology test-ordering behaviour of Australian general practice trainees: a cross-sectional analysis†.

    • Simon Morgan, Kim M Henderson, Amanda Tapley, John Scott, Mieke L Van Driel, Neil A Spike, Lawrie A Mcarthur, Andrew R Davey, Chris Oldmeadow, Jean Ball, and Parker J Magin.
    • General Practice Training Valley to Coast, PO Box 573, HRMC, Mayfield, NSW 2310, Australia.
    • Int J Qual Health Care. 2015 Dec 1; 27 (6): 528-35.

    ObjectiveIn the context of increasing over-testing and the implications for patient safety, to establish the prevalence and nature of pathology test-ordering of GP trainees, and to describe the associations of this test-ordering.DesignA cross-sectional analysis of data from the Registrar Clinical Encounters in Training (ReCEnT) cohort study.SettingFive of Australia's 17 general practice regional training providers, encompassing urban-to-very remote practices.ParticipantsGP trainees.Main Outcome MeasuresThe number of pathology tests ordered per problem/diagnosis managed.ResultsA total of 856 individual trainees (response rate 95.2%) contributed data from 1832 trainee-terms, 108 759 encounters and 169 304 problems. Pathology test-ordering prevalence was 79.3 tests (95% CI: 78.8-79.8) per 100 encounters, 50.9 (95% CI: 50.6-51.3) per 100 problems, and at least 1 test was requested in 22.4% of consultations. Most commonly ordered was full blood count (6.1 per 100 problems). The commonest problem prompting test-ordering was 'check-up' (18.6%). Test-ordering was significantly associated, on multivariable analysis, with the trainee having worked at the practice previously; the patient being adult, male and new to both trainee and practice; the practice being urban; the problem/diagnosis being new; imaging being ordered; referral being made and follow-up being arranged. Trainees were significantly less likely to order tests for problems/diagnoses for which they had sought in-consultation information or advice.ConclusionsCompared with the established GPs, trainees order more pathology tests per consultation and per problem managed, and in a higher proportion of consultations. Our findings will inform educational policy to enhance quality and safety in general practice training.© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press in association with the International Society for Quality in Health Care; all rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.