• Acta Anaesthesiol Scand · Nov 2004

    Comment Historical Article

    Further commentary on Denmark's 1952-53 poliomyelitis epidemic, especially regarding mortality; with a correction.

    • R V Trubuhovich.
    • Department of Critical Care Medicine, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand. rvt.met@pl.net
    • Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2004 Nov 1;48(10):1310-5.

    AbstractBerthelsen and Cronqvist recently published an article in Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica including aspects which could lead on to further discussion about the Danish 1952-53 poliomyelitis epidemic. This paper considers how Bjørn Ibsen's initial approach to treatment during the epidemic was successful, as well as how it could have failed; the roles played by ventilatory failure vs. gross neurologic destruction in causing deaths; and compilations from publications of statistics concerning mortality of the epidemic. The Blegdam Hospital concept of 'life-threatening poliomyelitis' is revisited, along with its division into six anatomico-clinical categories for the 345 patients so classified. Attention is drawn to the severity of assorted cerebral lesions demonstrated in 114 of the 115 autopsies conducted from the 144 fatal cases. Despite an overall mortality rate of 41.6% among the entire epidemic's sickest patients, a lowest mortality rate of 11% in the last 18 of such patients is identified. Note is made of the difficulty in reconciling various sources for certain features -- for which the 1956 book on the epidemic, edited by H.C.A. Lassen, has been freely used. Some folklore about aspects of management is mentioned. In the light of other recent research by Dr Berthelsen an essential correction is needed in dating 'Bjørn Ibsen's Day', amending 26 August 1952 to the 27th.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…