• F Clergue and S Cohen.
• Département d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris.
• Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 1991 Jan 1;10(6):504-15.

AbstractThis study reports the results of a survey of post-anaesthesia recovery rooms (PARR) in French public University Hospitals (UH), and in those of the "Ile de France" (IdFH) area. The study, carried out between the 2nd and 8th of April 1990, aimed to identify the place where patients recovered from anaesthesia, and the personnel and monitoring equipment available in these places. 90% of 55 departments of anaesthesia and intensive care in University Hospitals and 94% of 34 departments in "Ile de France" Hospitals responded. A total number of 20,567 patients was collected, with 10,027 from University Hospitals. Of the latter, 31.4% recovered in the operating room or in the anaesthetic room itself; 7.5% were directly transferred to an intensive care unit (ICU), and 61.1% (10,397) were admitted to a PARR. However, 2,460 of those admitted to such a PARR were in fact admitted to a PARR without any permanent nursing staff. Overall, 45.8% of the patients were not admitted to a PARR where adequate care by nurses was available. Of the 3,540 patients anaesthetized in "Ile de France" Hospitals, 3.1% were transferred to an ICU, 25% were not admitted to a PARR, and the remaining 71.7% were. However, 35% of those admitted to a PARR were admitted to a PARR without any permanent nursing staff. Therefore 50.1% of patients anaesthetized in the "Ile de France" Hospitals did not benefit from adequate post-anaesthetic supervision. In 82% of the patients anaesthetized in University Hospitals, the lowest rates of admission to a PARR were found in patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy (GIE), and ENT, ophthalmological or stomatological surgical procedures. After anaesthesia for GIE, 69% of patients recovered at the anaesthetic post and 12% were admitted to a PARR without any permanent nursing staff. In ENT-Ophthalmology-Stomatology, Gynaecology and Obstetrics, and Radiology departments, 56%, 69% and 69% of patients, respectively, recovered in the anaesthetic room or in a PARR without any permanent staff, or, for the Radiology and Obstetrics departments, sent straight back to their room. Similar results were obtained with the patients in the "Ile de France" Hospitals. Nurses were not always present in 37% and 24% of PARR in University and "Ile de France" Hospitals respectively. In the PARR, there were three ECG monitors for 4 beds, and one pulse oximeter for seven beds. It seems therefore that, despite several ministerial recommendations, not all anaesthetized patients are admitted to a recovery room after their anaesthetic.

13 keywords...

hide…