• C Magnin, E N Bory, and J Motin.
• Service d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, Hôpital Edouard-Herriot, Lyon.
• Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 1991 Jan 1;10(2):171-4.

AbstractThis study analyses 126 cases of dental injuries occurring during endotracheal intubation, reported to the service of litigations of the hospitals in Lyon over a ten-year period, and giving rise to a complaint. The overall rate was 1 out of 4,000 cases of intubation. The true incidence may be greater. As expected, the upper jaw teeth are most often involved, especially the left incisors. Among them 24.3% of the involved teeth were normal. Dental fractures were the most common lesion, together with total or partial dislocations. A questionnaire was sent to 534 anaesthetists to assess the main difficulties which they encounter when carrying out endotracheal intubation. The results of this enquiry demonstrated that anaesthetists were very aware of dental risks when carrying out intubation, and that there was a lack of efficient protective measures. Among them 81.2% claimed they would use a protective device from time to time, and 17.4% routinely, if one were available. Therefore we designed such a device. It is gutter-shaped, made with two different plastics, the more rigid one being on the outside. It fits over the upper jaw teeth. There is an indentation in the front, to check whether the device is placed correctly. The inner surface is made of foam which dulls the pressure which may be exerted on the device during intubation. This device was tested in 108 patients. Intubation was easy with the device in place in 73.2% of patients; mouth opening was reduced by a mean of 4.2 +/- 0.5 mm. The device made intubation more difficult, and even impossible, in patients whose mouth opened no more than 3.5 cm.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

20 keywords...

hide…