• T Chevalley, R Rizzoli, V Nydegger, D Slosman, L Tkatch, C H Rapin, H Vasey, and J P Bonjour.
• Division of Clinical Pathophysiology, Orthopaedic Clinic, University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland.
• Osteoporos Int. 1991 Jun 1;1(3):147-54.

AbstractBone mass is an important determinant of resistance to fractures. Whether bone mineral density (BMD) in subjects with a fracture of the proximal femur (hip fracture) is different from that of age-matched controls is still debated. We measured BMD of the femoral neck (FN) on the opposite side to the fracture, as well as femoral shaft (FS) and lumbar spine (LS) BMD by dual-photon absorptiometry in 68 patients (57 women and 11 men, mean age 78.8 +/- 1.0) 12.4 +/- 0.8 days after hip fracture following a moderate trauma. These values were compared with BMD of 93 non-fractured elderly control subjects (82 women and 11 men), measured during the same period. As compared with the controls, FN BMD was significantly lower in fractured women (0.592 +/- 0.013 v. 0.728 +/- 0.014 g/cm2, P less than 0.001) and in fractured men (0.697 +/- 0.029 v. 0.840 +/- 0.052, P less than 0.05). Expressed as standard deviations above or below the mean BMD of age and sex-matched normal subjects (Z-score), the difference in FN BMD between fractured women and controls was highly significant (-0.6 +/- 0.1 v. +0.1 +/- 0.1, P less than 0.001). As compared with mean BMD of young normal subjects, BMD was decreased by 36.9 +/- 1.4 and 22.4 +/- 1.5% (P less than 0.001) in fractured and control women, respectively. There was no significant difference between FN BMD of 33 women with cervical and 24 with trochanteric hip fractures (0.603 +/- 0.017 v. 0.577 +/- 0.020). FN BMD was lower than 0.705 g/cm2 in 90% of fractured women.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

13 keywords...

hide…