• Clinical imaging · Sep 2004

    Comparative Study

    CT screening for lung cancer Assessing a regimen's diagnostic performance.

    • Claudia I Henschke, David F Yankelevitz, James P Smith, Daniel Libby, Mark Pasmantier, Dorothy McCauley, Georgeann McGuinness, David P Naidich, Ali Farooqi, Madeline Vasquez, and Olli S Miettinen.
    • Department of Radiology, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY 10021, USA. chensch@med.cornell.edu
    • Clin Imaging. 2004 Sep 1;28(5):317-21.

    PurposeThe purpose of this study was to characterize the diagnostic performance of a regimen of CT screening for lung cancer.MethodsUsing a common protocol/regimen of screening, 2968 asymptomatic persons at high risk for lung cancer were enrolled in two studies [Early Lung Cancer Action Projects (ELCAP) I and II] for baseline and annual repeat screening. A total of 4538 annual repeat screenings were performed. The regimen's diagnostic performance was characterized in terms of frequency of positive result of the initial CT as well as of screen-diagnosis and Stage I screen-diagnosis among all diagnoses (interim-diagnoses included), all separately for baseline and annual repeat screenings.ResultsThe proportions with positive result of the initial CT were 12% and 6% in the baseline and repeat screenings, respectively. The proportions of screen-diagnoses among all diagnoses (interim-diagnoses included) were 97% and 99% in the baseline and repeat cycles, respectively. The corresponding proportions of pre-surgical Stage I screen-diagnoses were 95% and 93%.ConclusionThe performance of the ELCAP regimen is quite satisfactory in avoiding over many positive results of the initial CT, and it produces highly promising diagnostic results as for the attainment of cure by early intervention.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.