• Nutrition · Apr 2016

    The development, application, and validation of a Healthy eating index for Australian Adults (HEIFA-2013).

    • Rajshri Roy, Lana Hebden, Anna Rangan, and Margaret Allman-Farinelli.
    • Department of Nutrition and Metabolism, School of Molecular Bioscience, Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. Electronic address: rajshri.roy@sydney.edu.au.
    • Nutrition. 2016 Apr 1; 32 (4): 432440432-40.

    ObjectiveDiet quality indices are used to assess dietary behavior and adherence to dietary guideline recommendations. The aim of this study was to develop, apply, and validate a Healthy Eating Index for Australian Adults (HEIFA-2013) based on the updated Dietary Guidelines for Australians 2013.MethodsThe HEIFA-2013 used an 11-component system of 5 food groups, 4 nutrients, water intake, and a measure of dietary variety. The total possible index score was 100. The HEIFA-2013 was applied to weighed food record (WFR) and food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) data of a sample (n = 100) of young adults. The HEIFA-2013 was assessed using principal components analysis (PCA), Cronbach's coefficient, and correlation coefficient with nutrient intakes. Scores for HEIFA-2013 components were compared between methods using means, frequencies, 95% limits of agreement, Bland and Altman methods, and weighted kappa.ResultsPCA indicated that multiple underlying dimensions compose the index, and Cronbach's coefficient α was 0.41. A higher HEIFA-2013 was associated with higher dietary quality, including a low intake of saturated fat and sodium and a high intake of selected vitamins and minerals. Low correlations with energy were observed. The mean HEIFA-2013 score ± standard error (SE) for the WFR was 53.84 ± 1 and for the FFQ was 54.82 ± 0.9. The total mean scores were 54.33 ± 0.1. Young adults had the lowest mean scores for sodium (2.9 ± 0.2), fat (3.0 ± 0.0), vegetables (4.7 ± 0.1), and grains (5.1 ± 0.1). The WFR and FFQ scored individual components differently, but at the group level the differences were not significant.ConclusionsThe HEIFA-2013 will need to be catered for different diet collection methods. It is a useful index of overall diet quality and can be used to monitor changes in dietary intake of adults over time. The findings infer that even a highly educated affluent group of young adults fails to meet recommended dietary guidelines.Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.