• E Ornstein, R S Matteo, J A Weinstein, and A E Schwartz.
• Department of Anesthesiology, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032.
• J Clin Anesth. 1988 Jan 1;1(1):31-5.

AbstractTwenty-five patients scheduled for lumbar fusion or cerebrovascular surgery were enrolled in an open label treatment controlled study comparing blood pressure and heart rate responses during deliberate hypotension with either esmolol or nitroprusside during steady-state N2O/isoflurane anesthesia. The first 5 patients were empirically assigned to the esmolol group; the remaining 20 patients were randomized to receive either esmolol or nitroprusside. The target of 15% reduction in mean arterial pressure (MAP) from baseline determined during anesthesia was attained with esmolol 195 +/- 10 micrograms/kg/min (mean +/- SEM) for the group (n = 15) or nitroprusside 1.9 +/- 0.3 micrograms/kg/min for the nitroprusside group (n = 10). Nitroprusside use was associated with a 15.9 +/- 5.3% increase in heart rate compared to a 12.1 +/- 2.2% decrease in the esmolol group (p = 0.0001 between groups). Upon termination of the hypotensive infusions, nitroprusside patients had a MAP increase of 13.9 +/- 5.5% above baseline (p less than 0.05 compared to prehypotension) while the 7.4 +/- 3.5% increase in the esmolol group was not statistically significant. Although 30% of nitroprusside patients overshot their baseline MAP by more than 25%, no esmolol patients had this degree of rebound. One esmolol patient had a brief period of atrial premature contractions. No patient in either group suffered any adverse reaction to hypotension. It is concluded that in moderate doses esmolol is a safe and effective hypotensive agent during isoflurane anesthesia, with no reflex tachycardia and no significant potential for rebound hypertension. A MAP reduction of 30% from preanesthesia baseline was readily obtained with this combination.

17 keywords...

hide…