• The Journal of infection · Nov 2013

    Review Meta Analysis

    Commercial MPT64-based tests for rapid identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex: a meta-analysis.

    • Xiaomao Yin, Lei Zheng, Li Lin, Yarong Hu, Fen Zheng, Yanwei Hu, and Qian Wang.
    • Department of Laboratory Medicine, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, No. 1838, North of Guangzhou Road, Baiyun District, Guangzhou 510515, PR China.
    • J. Infect. 2013 Nov 1;67(5):369-77.

    ObjectiveWe did a systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies to evaluate the accuracy of commercial MPT64-based immunochromatographic tests for rapid identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex.MethodsWe identified studies by searching Pubmed, BIOSIS Previews and Web of Science, and included studies using predetermined inclusion criteria. The data were pooled using the DerSimonian-Laird random effects model.ResultsA total of 28 studies were included in the final analysis. Pooled estimates were 97% (confidence interval [CI] 96-97%) for sensitivity and 98% (CI 98-99%) for specificity. The summary receiver operating characteristic curve showed an area of 0.9968 and a Q* of 0.98. Subgroup analysis showed that test accuracy did not depend on commercial kit, reference test and medium.ConclusionsCommercial MPT64-based immunochromatographic tests are highly sensitive and specific for rapid identification of M. tuberculosis complex. They are good alternatives to biochemical test and molecular assays. Nevertheless, additional studies are required in setting with high prevalence of mpt64 mutations or high contamination of cultures.Copyright © 2013 The British Infection Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.