• L Palud, M Laurent, P Guéret, C Meunier, E Garin, P O Benoît, C Belléguic, F Bernard du Haut Cilly, C Almange, and J C Daubert.
• Département de cardiologie et maladies vasculaires, CHU Pontchaillou, Rennes.
• Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 2004 Feb 1;97(2):93-9.

AbstractNew diagnostic tools in suspected pulmonary embolism complete the classical diagnostic strategy of pulmonary scintigraphy and pulmonary angiography to limit the indications of these two invasive investigations. In a prospective series of 204 consecutive patients with suspected pulmonary embolism the association of D-dimer measurement and clinical probability was assessed for the exclusion of the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. The D-DI Liatest is a new generation, unitary, rapid and quantitative latex test with a comparative diagnostic performance to that of the reference ELISA test, and well adapted to emergency situations.The clinical probability was assessed by a quantitative score based on past history, clinical symptoms and signs. The positive diagnosis of pulmonary embolism was made by spiral CT scanner and/or pulmonary angiography, associated with Duplex ultrasonography of the leg veins in nondiagnostic results. The prevalence of pulmonary embolism was 42.6% and the absence of anticoagulation in patients considered not to have pulmonary embolism was associated with a thrombo-embolic incidence of 0.9% at 3 months. Fifty-six patients had D-dimer concentrations equal or inferior to the threshold of 500 microg/L; the sensitivity was 99% and the specificity 47% with a negative predictive value of 98% to 100% in cases with a low clinical probability. D-dimer measurement is reliable and has a high cost-benefit value in ambulatory patients with suspected of pulmonary embolism and is even more valuable when the clinical probability of this diagnosis is low.

12 keywords...

hide…