• Resp Care · Sep 2001

    Utility of measurements of oxygen cost of breathing in predicting success or failure in trials of reduced mechanical ventilatory support.

    • M Mitsuoka, K H Kinninger, F W Johnson, and D M Burns.
    • Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of California at San Diego, Medical Center, San Diego, California, USA.
    • Resp Care. 2001 Sep 1;46(9):902-10.

    ObjectiveTest whether a change in oxygen consumption produced by a reduction in level of mechanical ventilatory support predicts failure to tolerate the reduction in level of support.DesignProspective study of the sensitivity and specificity of increased oxygen cost of breathing as a predictor of failure to tolerate a reduction in ventilatory support in patients undergoing weaning, using a protocol that incrementally reduces the level of mechanical ventilatory support.SettingUniversity medical center.MethodsWe studied 228 trials in 30 patients who had required mechanical ventilatory support for at least 72 hours and who were being weaned using a standardized protocol that provided for three 30-minute trials of reduced mechanical ventilatory support per day, followed by ventilatory muscle rest. Using a metabolic monitor, we monitored oxygen consumption (V(O(2))) prior to and during 228 incremental reductions in level of mechanical ventilatory support conducted as part of a standardized weaning protocol. Oxygen cost of breathing was defined as the difference in V(O(2)) (Delta V(O(2))) during the trial of reduced mechanical ventilatory support, compared to a 30-minute resting period immediately before the trial. A successful trial was defined as one that could be continued for 30 minutes without development of clinical signs of ventilatory failure. Changes in V(O(2)) and the ratio of respiratory frequency to tidal volume (f/V(T)) during a weaning trial were evaluated as predictors for failure of a 30-minute trial of reduced ventilatory support.ResultsA 15% increase in oxygen cost of breathing predicted failure in the trial, with a sensitivity of 96.6%, specificity of 85.7%, positive predictive value of 98.5%, and negative predictive value of 72.0%. Neither change in V(O(2)) measured early in the trial nor f/V(T) proved to be as successful in predicting failure to tolerate an incremental reduction in ventilatory support.ConclusionChange in V(O(2)) following an incremental reduction in level of mechanical ventilatory support may be a useful predictor for determining which patients will rapidly fail to tolerate that level of reduction.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.