• Ann Fr Anesth Reanim · Apr 2011

    Comparative Study Clinical Trial

    [High-flow nasal oxygen for severe hypoxemia after cardiac surgery].

    • J Nicolet, F Poulard, D Baneton, J-C Rigal, and Y Blanloeil.
    • Service d'anesthésie-réanimation chirurgicale, hôpital Laennec, BP 1005, boulevard Jacques-Monod, 44093 Nantes cedex 1, France. johanna.nicolet@chu-nantes.fr
    • Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2011 Apr 1;30(4):331-4.

    ObjectivesHigh-flow nasal oxygen (Optiflow™) is validated in paediatric intensive care but not in adults' patients for severe hypoxemia. The aim of this study was to evaluate this oxygen system delivery in adults' patients for postoperative hypoxemia after cardiac surgery.Study DesignProspective, open study for evaluation of medical practice.Patients And MethodsPatients operated upon for cardiac surgery with immediate postoperative hypoxemia characterized by SpO(2) <0.96 with 50% oxygen with a Venturi mask were treated with the high-flow nasal oxygen system (O group) when it was available or with the classical high-flow oxygen face mask (M group). Gas exchanges were measured at the end of the surgery, at the beginning of the treatment and 1 hour, 6 hours after the inclusion and at day 1 and 2 post-treatment. Parameters studied were: duration of hypoxemia, duration of ICU stay, postoperative pneumonia occurrence, requirement of re-intubation, non invasive ventilation and catecholamine. Tolerance was evaluated with measurement of pain (visual scale), satisfaction (visual scale), and dryness of mouth.ResultsForty patients were included, 19 in group O, 21 in group M. Patient's characteristics did not differ between the two groups before treatment. There were no significant differences between groups for duration of hypoxemia (3.8±2.2 days in O group versus 4.3±2.3 days in M group), duration of hypoxemia, duration of ICU stay, postoperative pneumonia occurrence, requirement of re-intubation, non invasive ventilation and catecholamine. Pain was not significantly different between groups, satisfaction was better (P<0.001) and mouth drier (P<0.001) in group O than in group M.ConclusionThese results give good arguments for an improvement in gas exchange and better tolerance of high-flow nasal oxygen (Optiflow™) versus classical high-flow oxygen face mask in postoperative cardiac patients. These results must be confirmed by a randomised study with a larger population.Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.