• Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi · Feb 2009

    Comparative Study

    [A comparison of the predictive values of three clinical scoring systems for suspected acute pulmonary embolism based on multidetector CT angiography].

    • Xiao-juan Guo, Min Liu, You-min Guo, Hong-xia Ma, Yu-lin Guo, Li Zhu, Jian-guo Wang, Yuan-hua Yang, and Chen Wang.
    • Beijing Chao-yang Hospital Affiliated to Capital University of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100020, China.
    • Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi. 2009 Feb 1;32(2):119-23.

    ObjectiveTo explore whether acute pulmonary embolism (APE) can be quantitatively predicated early with 3 clinical scoring systems, with multidetector CT angiography (MDCTA) as the gold standard, and therefore to select a scoring system more suitable for the Chinese.MethodsFive hundred and seventy consecutive inpatients with highly suspected APE underwent prospective MDCTA at the time of initial diagnosis. Three clinical predication scoring systems (Wells', Geneva' and revised Geneva') were used to estimate APE in low, moderate and high probability groups. Two radiologists independently reviewed the MDCTA without any clinical information. When consensus could not be reached, a third radiologist with 20-years' experience was asked to make the final decision. The threshold value for the prediction of APE by the 3 scoring systems was measured by receiver-operating-characteristics (ROC) analysis.ResultsAPE was identified in 169 of the 570 cases. Kappa analysis for the 3 scoring systems revealed a low level of agreement: 0.269-0.374, P<0.05. The result of the Geneva score was consistent with that of the revised Geneva score, between them there was an excellent correlation. The positive predictive values of Wells, Geneva, revised Geneva scores for APE were 83.8%, 53.3%, and 61.3% respectively, while the negative predictive values were 85.0%, 80.6%, and 80.0%, respectively. ROC analysis showed that the area under curve (AUC) of Wells, Geneva and revised Geneva score for APE was 0.823 (95% CI: 0.710-0.976), 0.677 (95% CI: 0.646-0.990), and 0.661 (95% CI: 0.631-0.983), respectively. The Wells score showed the best discriminatory ability as compared to the other 2 scores.ConclusionThe 3 scoring systems can be used for both inpatients and emergency cases, while the Wells Score may be more accurate for Chinese people for predicting APE.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.