• Physiological measurement · Feb 2003

    Transfer function analysis for clinical evaluation of dynamic cerebral autoregulation--a comparison between spontaneous and respiratory-induced oscillations.

    • M Reinhard, T Müller, B Guschlbauer, J Timmer, and A Hetzel.
    • Department of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, University of Freiburg, Germany.
    • Physiol Meas. 2003 Feb 1;24(1):27-43.

    AbstractOscillations of arterial blood pressure (ABP) and cerebral blood flow velocity (CBFV) can be used for non-invasive assessment of cerebral autoregulation using transfer function analysis. Either spontaneous oscillations (SPO) around 0.1 Hz or respiratory induced oscillations during deep breathing (DB) at a rate of 6/min have been used so far. We investigated 168 patients with severe carotid stenosis or occlusion to evaluate transfer function analysis and compare the SPO and DB approaches. ABP was assessed non-invasively (Finapres), CBFV was measured in the middle cerebral artery using transcranial Doppler sonography. Transfer function phase (P) and gain (G) were extracted from the respective spectra in a low (0.06-0.12 Hz) and high (0.20-0.30 Hz) frequency range (LF, HF) of SPO and from the 0.1 (LF) and 0.2 (HF) Hz peaks induced by DB. For SPO, significant side-to-side differences and differences between groups of severe and critical stenosis were found for P(LF), while P(HF) did not prove to be a significant parameter. G(LF) showed significant side-to-side differences, while G(HF) additionally differed significantly between severe and critical stenosis and occlusion, respectively. For DB, significant side-to-side differences were found for P(LF, HF). Mainly G(HF) differed significantly between the affected and contralateral sides, while both HF and LF gains showed lower values in groups with a higher degree of stenosis. Correlation between G and P values was generally poor. Using Bland-Altman plots a poor inter-method agreement was found mainly for P. Correlations between SPO and DB were higher for G than for P (LF r = 0.64 versus 0.44, HF 0.69 versus 0.28). Analysing reproducibility in 16 patients, only for P(LF, HF) of DB was a highly significant correlation found (Spearman's r up to 0.78). For G(LF, HF) correlations were significant for both SPO and DB with slightly higher r coefficients for SPO. In conclusion, the present study showed that (1) transfer functions P and G represent different information for characterization of dynamic cerebral autoregulation in the frequency domain. (2) Inter-method agreement between DB and SPO is poor for P and moderate for G values. (3) P extracted from DB has a higher reproducibility. (4) The extraction of P and G from the SPO phase spectra is critical and future work on standardizing this process is needed. (5) At present, the DB protocol might be slightly advantageous as a routine diagnostic tool.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,694,794 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.