• M Galinski, N Loubardi, M C Duchossoy, and M Chauvin.
• Département d'anesthésie et de réanimation, hôpital Ambroise-Paré, 9, avenue Charles-de-Gaulle, 92104 Boulogne-Billancourt, France. michel.galinski@avc.ap-paris.fr
• Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2003 Mar 1; 22 (3): 179-82.

ObjectivesTheory knowledge and attitude assessment about in-hospital cardiac arrest (CA) basic life support by hospital staff.MethodsWe tested medical and paramedical working staff in a 450 beds university hospital with anonymous questionnaire based on training for basic life support. Questions were about presence of a formation before, clinical signs reached in front of unconscious patient, attitude in front of cardiac-arrest, practical experience with basic life support and ward emergency trolley.ResultsFive hundred and seventy one on 996 people answered to handed out questionnaires (57%): 158 from medical staff (Med group) and 413 from nurses "Pmed". Seventy one percent people from "Med" group and 64% from "Pmed" received one time at least training about cardiac-arrest. Front of unconscious patient, no spontaneous breath was reached explicitly by 55% people from Med group and 19% from "Pmed" group and central pulse was reached explicitly by 70% people from "Med" group and 18% from "Pmed" group. Front of CA, 50% people from "Med" group released airway, 75% began ventilation and 86%, External Heart Compression (EHC) and 42% called for rescue. There were respectively 29, 47, 64 and 60% people from "Pmed" group. Eighty-one percent people from "Med" group thought they knew to do ventilation and 82% did it one time at least. Eighty-eight thought they knew to do EHC and 85% did it one time at least. They were respectively 67, 76, 73 and 78% people from Pmed group. Sixty-four per cent of Med group people know that there is emergency trolley in there department versus 89% for "Pmed" group.ConclusionThis study showed that theoretical knowledge of hospital staff about cardiac arrest diagnostic and management are insufficient from the point of view of national and international guidelines. Analysis is difficult because of weak response number and knowledge people overestimation.

13 keywords...

hide…