• Christina Olsson, Nina Buer, Kerstin Holm, and Lena Nilsson-Wikmar.
• CeFAM, Stockholm County Council, Huddinge, Sweden. christina.b.olsson@sll.se
• Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2009 Jan 1;88(4):378-85.

ObjectiveTo examine and compare levels of catastrophizing, fear-avoidance beliefs, physical ability, and health-related quality of life in women with and without lumbopelvic pain (LP and NLP) in early pregnancy.DesignA cross-sectional study of early pregnancy.SettingFive midwife clinics, one in the center, two in the outskirts of Stockholm, and two in a medium-sized town.PopulationThree hundred and twenty-four women in the 19th-21st week of pregnancy.MethodsQuestionnaires.Main Outcome MeasuresThe Pain Catastrophizing Scale of exaggerated negative thoughts about pain experiences, the Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire of beliefs about how physical activity and work affect back pain, the Disability Rating Index of physical ability, and the Nottingham Health Profile to assess health-related quality of life.ResultsTwo groups were defined: LP (n=141) and NLP (n=183). The Mann-Whitney U-test was used for comparisons. Pregnant women with LP had significantly (p<0.05) higher levels of exaggerated negative thoughts and fear-avoidance beliefs. They also had lower physical ability and health-related quality of life compared to women in the NLP group.ConclusionsIt is important to consider exaggerated negative thoughts about pain experiences and fear-avoidance beliefs when treating women with LP during pregnancy and to be aware of the great impact lumbopelvic pain has on women's lives during early pregnancy.

18 keywords...

hide…