-
Gastrointest. Endosc. · Feb 2012
Comparative Study Controlled Clinical TrialBlinded nonrandomized comparative study of gastric examination with a magnetically guided capsule endoscope and standard videoendoscope.
- Jean-Francois Rey, Haruhiko Ogata, Naoki Hosoe, Kazuo Ohtsuka, Noriyuki Ogata, Keiichi Ikeda, Hiroyuki Aihara, Ileana Pangtay, Toshifumi Hibi, Shin-ei Kudo, and Hisao Tajiri.
- Hepato-Gastroenterology Department, Institut Arnault Tzanck, St. Laurent du Var, France.
- Gastrointest. Endosc. 2012 Feb 1;75(2):373-81.
BackgroundPassive video capsule endoscopy is the criterion standard for small-bowel exploration but cannot be used for the large gastric cavity. We report the first blinded comparative clinical trial in humans comparing a magnetically guided capsule endoscope (MGCE) and a conventional high-definition gastroscope.ObjectiveTo assess the potential of gastric examination with a guided capsule.DesignBlinded, nonrandomized comparative study.SettingSingle endoscopy center.MethodsThe trial involved 61 patients included in a blinded capsule and gastroscopy comparative study. MGCE examination was performed 24 hours after patients had undergone gastroscopy. To remove food residue or mucus, patients drank 900 mL of water in 2 portions. Then to provide the air-water interface required by the guidance system, they drank 400 mL of water at 35°C.ResultsVisualization of the gastric pylorus, antrum, body, fundus, and cardia was evaluated as complete in 88.5%, 86.9%, 93.4%, 85.2%, and 88.5% of patients, respectively. Of gastric lesions, 58.3% were detected by both gastroscopy and MGCE at immediate assessment and review of recorded data. Capsule examination missed 14 findings and gastroscopy missed 31 findings seen with MGCE. Overall diagnostic yield was similar for both modalities.LimitationPilot study.ConclusionsDiagnostic results were similar for the 2 methods. After some technical difficulties related to gastric expansion or presence of mucus had been overcome, this study opened a new field for noninvasive gastric examination in countries where high gastric cancer incidence demands a screening tool.Copyright © 2012 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.