• A Levin, S Datta, and W R Camann.
• Department of Anesthesia, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.
• Anesth. Analg. 1998 Sep 1;87(3):624-7.

UnlabelledRopivacaine has less potential for central nervous system and cardiovascular toxicity than bupivacaine; in pregnant patients and volunteers, it produces less motor block in equianalgesic doses than bupivacaine. We compared two doses of intrathecal ropivacaine combined with sufentanil with a standard dose of intrathecal bupivacaine plus sufentanil for labor analgesia using a combined spinal-epidural (CSE) technique. In a prospective, randomized, double-blind fashion, 48 patients requesting labor analgesia received either 2.5 mg of intrathecal bupivacaine plus sufentanil 10 microg (B), 2 mg of intrathecal ropivacaine plus sufentanil 10 microg (R2), or 4 mg of intrathecal ropivacaine plus sufentanil 10 microg (R4). Duration of analgesia and side effects, such as motor block, pruritus, hypotension, ephedrine requirements and fetal bradycardia, were recorded. Duration of analgesia (mean +/- SD) was 79+/-30 min for R2, 98+/-19 min for R4, and 92+/-38 min for B (P = not significant). No differences in motor block or side effects were detected among the groups. We conclude that ropivacaine, when combined with sufentanil, is effective for providing CSE labor analgesia and offers no advantage over bupivacaine in the studied doses.ImplicationsIn this study, we compared a standard dose of intrathecal bupivacaine with sufentanil for combined spinal epidural analgesia with two doses of the new local anesthetic ropivacaine. Both local anesthetics provided similar labor analgesia duration with equivalent side effect profiles in the doses studied.

18 keywords...

hide…