• Norman Stein, Holger Matz, Andreas Schneeweiss, Christian Eckmann, Angela Roth-Isigkeit, Michael Hüppe, and Hartmut Gehring.
• Department of Anesthesiology, University Clinic of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Luebeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, D-23538 Luebeck, Germany.
• Resp Care. 2006 Oct 1;51(10):1162-6.

BackgroundSince there is a growing use of analgesia and sedation in spontaneously breathing patients undergoing diagnostic or therapeutic interventions, recommendations by national societies of anesthesiologists call for the application of capnometry during all anesthetic procedures.MethodsWe compared readings from a transcutaneous capnometer (Tosca) and an end-tidal capnometer (Microcap Plus) to P(aCO2) measurements made via arterial-blood-gas analysis. We studied 30 spontaneously breathing patients who were recovering from general anesthesia, and we used Bland Altman analysis to compare the capnometry readings to the arterial-blood-gas values. Expiratory gas samples for end-tidal capnometry were taken either from a conventional face mask or an oral/nasal cannula.ResultsThe Tosca significantly overestimates P(aCO2) (mean +/- SD difference 5.6 + 3.4 mm Hg). The Microcap Plus significantly underestimates P(aCO2) (mean +/- SD difference -14.1 +/- 7.4 mm Hg). There was no significant difference between the face mask and oral/nasal cannula with regard to collecting end-tidal samples.ConclusionBoth the Tosca and Microcap Plus provide just an approximate estimation of P(aCO2). Clinical use of these monitors can not be proposed under actual conditions but will be advantageous after correction of the limiting errors.

16 keywords...

hide…