• P A Lichter, R North, A D Andre, T H Riehle, and S M Anderson.
• Koronis Biomedical Technologies Corp. 6901 E. Fish Lake Road, Suite 190, Maple Grove, MN 55369, USA. plichter@koronisbiotech.com
• Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2009 Jan 1;2009:6755-60.

AbstractA positive impact on cardiac arrest survival has been demonstrated with the substantial reduction in time to defibrillation provided by the widespread deployment of automated external defibrillators (AEDs). However, recent studies have identified the importance of performing chest compressions before defibrillation in facilitating effective recovery from long duration ventricular fibrillation (VF). Despite the importance of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), effective performance of it in the field is hampered by many problems including the dependence on rescuer technique, which is known to be variable even with trained professionals. This research seeks to enhance survival outcomes following resuscitation. A full experimental system was developed that used an instrumented CPR manikin to provide interactive CPR coaching while collecting performance data. This system was utilized in a controlled human CPR performance study comparing the differences in chest compression performance with and without visual coaching and with and without interactive performance feedback coaching. Results from the human study support a number of conclusions and recommendations. In general using any type of coaching provided improvements in all of the CPR performance measures excluding chest recoil where there was a slight decrease in performance. The statistical results also indicated that the audio/visual coaching conditions provided a more effective coaching condition with respect to chest compression rate. Most notably, the feedback conditions both provided a statistically significant or trends toward improving chest compression effectiveness and produced superior performance as a whole.

8 keywords...

hide…