• Y Coisel, A Jourdan, M Conseil, Y Pouzeratte, D Verzilli, B Jung, G Chanques, and S Jaber.
• Département d'anesthésie-réanimation St-Éloi, CHU de Montpellier, 80, avenue Augustin-Fliche, 34295 Montpellier cedex 5, France; Inserm U1046, université Montpellier 1, Montpellier, France.
• Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2014 Jan 1;33(1):16-20.

ObjectiveTo describe the evolution of perioperative anesthesia practices in for esophageal cancer surgery.Patients And MethodsWe conducted an observational retrospective study in a single center evaluating main perioperative practices during 16 years (1994-2009). Statistical analysis was done on 4 chronologic quartiles of same sample size.ResultsTwo hundred and seven consecutive patients were included during the 4 periods 1994-1997 (n=52), 1997-1999 (n=52), 1999-2003 (n=52) and 2004-2009 (n=51). The main significant evolutions between the first and the fourth period were observed: (i) in ventilation: lower tidal volume (9.6[8.6-10.6] vs 7.6[7.0-8.3] mL/kg of ideal body weight (IBW), p<0.01), increased use of Positive End Expiratory Pressure (0 vs 83%, p<0.001) and increased use of post-operative non-invasive ventilation (0 vs 51%, p<0.001); (ii) in hemodynamic management: lower fluid replacement (20.6 [16.0-24.6] vs 12.6 [9.7-16.2] mL/h/kg of IBW, p<0.001); (iii) in analgesia: increased use of epidural thoracic anesthesia (31 vs 57%, p<0.001). Peroperative bleeding, type of fluid replacement, length of mechanical ventilation, length of stay in intensive care unit, ventilatory free days and mortality at day 28 didn't change.ConclusionsDuring these previous years, anesthesia practices in ventilation, hemodynamics and analgesia for esophageal cancer surgery have changed.Copyright © 2013 Société française d’anesthésie et de réanimation (Sfar). Published by Elsevier SAS. All rights reserved.

37 keywords...

hide…