• F B Miller, J D Richardson, H A Thomas, H M Cryer, and S J Willing.
• Department of Surgery, University of Louisville, KY 40292.
• Surgery. 1989 Oct 1;106(4):596-602; discussion 602-3.

AbstractThe role of computed tomography (CT) in the diagnosis of blunt thoracic vascular injury is controversial. Several recent reports have advocated the use of CT to exclude aortic and major branch injuries in hemodynamically stable patients with blunt trauma. This approach potentially avoids invasive angiography and unnecessary treatment delays in multiply injured patients but risks missed aortic transections if the CT or its interpretation is not accurate. We prospectively evaluated 153 consecutive trauma patients in whom we suspected blunt aortic injury between September 1985 and August 1988. All hemodynamically stable patients underwent contrast-enhanced chest CT followed by immediate aortic arch angiography. Forty-nine unstable patients underwent immediate angiography without chest CT, and 11 (22%) had major thoracic arterial injuries. Data from the remaining 104 stable patients indicate that the sensitivity of chest CT for diagnosis of major thoracic injury is 55%; specificity, 65%. If the chest CT had been used as a screening modality to perform aortic angiography, two transected aortas and three major aortic branch injuries would have been missed. We conclude that chest CT has no screening role in the evaluation of blunt trauma patients with possible major vascular injury.

25 keywords...

hide…