Surgery
-
The role of computed tomography (CT) in the diagnosis of blunt thoracic vascular injury is controversial. Several recent reports have advocated the use of CT to exclude aortic and major branch injuries in hemodynamically stable patients with blunt trauma. This approach potentially avoids invasive angiography and unnecessary treatment delays in multiply injured patients but risks missed aortic transections if the CT or its interpretation is not accurate. ⋯ Data from the remaining 104 stable patients indicate that the sensitivity of chest CT for diagnosis of major thoracic injury is 55%; specificity, 65%. If the chest CT had been used as a screening modality to perform aortic angiography, two transected aortas and three major aortic branch injuries would have been missed. We conclude that chest CT has no screening role in the evaluation of blunt trauma patients with possible major vascular injury.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Antibiotic prophylaxis for surgery in morbidly obese patients.
The rate of wound infections in morbidly obese patients who underwent gastroplasty surgery at our institution was 16.5% compared with a rate of 2.5% in normal-weight patients who underwent clean-contaminated surgery. Both groups received 1 gm of cefazolin intramuscularly before surgery was performed. We hypothesized that this regimen of prophylaxis did not provide adequate tissue levels in the morbidly obese. ⋯ Only when the morbidly obese patient received 2 gm cefazolin were both the serum and adipose tissue levels adequate. For a 4-month period, all morbidly obese patients received 2 gm cefazolin prophylaxis, and the wound infection rate dropped to 5.6% compared with the previous rate of 16.5% (p less than 0.03). We conclude that antibiotic prophylaxis must be specially tailored to the needs of these obese patients.
-
To determine the roles of diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL) and abdominal computed tomography (CT) in the evaluation of blunt abdominal trauma, we compared our results in the eras before and after the advent of abdominal CT. In the pre-CT era 1977 to 1980 (group 1; 365 patients), DPL was the diagnostic procedure of choice. In the CT era 1983 to 1986 (group 2; 282 patients), DPL was used for unstable, polytraumatized patients, and CT was reserved for stable patients. ⋯ Celiotomy was nontherapeutic in 21 (14%) patients in group 1 and in 5 (5%) in group 2 (p less than 0.02). Despite immediate availability of abdominal CT, clinical examination alone or in combination with DPL was the diagnostic procedure of choice in 41% of those with blunt abdominal trauma in group 2. The complementary use of abdominal CT and DPL in those with blunt abdominal trauma decreased the rate of nontherapeutic celiotomy, did not result in a significant increase in missed injuries, and allowed identification of candidates for nonoperative management of solid organ injury.