-
Comparative Study
3D isotropic turbo spin-echo intermediate-weighted sequence with refocusing control in knee imaging: comparison study with 3D isotropic fast-field echo sequence.
- Jung Min Seo, Young Cheol Yoon, and Jong Won Kwon.
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea.
- Acta Radiol. 2011 Dec 1;52(10):1119-24.
BackgroundThree-dimensional (3D) turbo spin-echo (TSE) images have been used in imaging of the extremities and comparable diagnostic performance to two-dimensional (2D) TSE images has been reported in several studies. However, comparison of the 3D isotropic TSE intermediate-weighted sequence and 3D FFE sequence in terms of image quality has not been investigated.PurposeTo compare the image quality of a 3D isotropic TSE intermediate-weighted sequence with refocusing control (volume isotropic turbo spin echo acquisition [VISTA]) and a 3D isotropic fast-field echo (FFE) sequence of the knee joint.Material And Methods3.0 T knee MRI with VISTA and 3D FFE sequences was performed in 10 healthy volunteers (3 men, 7 women; age range 26-30 years). Two radiologists with specialties in the musculoskeletal system assessed tissue contrast between the fluid-cruciate ligament (F-L), fluid-meniscus (F-M), and fluid-cartilage (F-C) based on a 4-point scale (1, poor; 2, fair; 3, good; and 4, excellent). Statistical analysis for inter-observer agreement and differences in grades in tissue contrast between VISTA and 3D FFE images (Wilcoxon signed-rank) were performed. For a quantitative analysis, the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) was obtained by imaging phantom and noise-only image. Image contrast ratios (CRs) were calculated between F-L, F-M, and F-C in volunteer images of VISTA and 3D FFE and compared statistically with a paired t-test.ResultsBased on qualitative analysis, VISTA had statistically superior grades of tissue contrast in F-L (P < 0.001) and F-M (P < 0.001). 3D FFE had superior but not statistically significant (P = 0.317) grades in F-C. Based on quantitative analysis, the SNR of the phantom imaging was higher in VISTA than that in 3D FFE (28.18 vs. 14.90). VISTA had superior CRs in F-L (P < 0.001) and F-M (P < 0.001). 3D FFE had superior CR in F-C (P = 0.038).ConclusionThe VISTA sequence was superior in tissue contrast between F-M and F-L, and 3D FFE was superior in tissue contrast between F-C, subjectively and quantitatively.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.