• Matthew G Snider, Steven J MacDonald, and Ralph Pototschnik.
• Faculty of Medicine, University of Western Ontario.
• Can J Surg. 2005 Oct 1;48(5):355-60.

BackgroundThe demand for total hip and total knee arthroplasties is increasing as are the waiting times for these procedures. Because of the differences between rural and urban areas in terms of the provision of arthroplasty services and between the 2 patient groups, patient perspectives of waiting times may also be different.MethodsTo compare waiting times for initial orthopedic consultation and total hip and knee arthroplasties in rural Ontario (Stratford) and in urban Ontario (London), and to compare patient perspectives of these waiting times, we mailed a survey to all 260 patients who underwent total hip or total knee arthroplasty between June 1, 2000, and June 1, 2001. The survey asked for the length of wait for consultation and for surgery, acceptability of waiting time for surgery, the effect of waiting on health and what an acceptable waiting time would be. Of the 260 surveys mailed 202 (78%) were returned. We reviewed the charts of the respondents to determine the actual waiting times.ResultsThe actual waiting times (mean [and standard deviation]) for initial consultation were significantly (p < 0.001) shorter in the rural (RUR) group (1.10 [0.53] mo) than the urban (URB) group (3.40 [1.34] mo). There was no significant difference in waiting times for surgery between RUR (8.45 [3.32] mo) and URB (9.32 [3.61] mo) groups. Surgical waiting times for both groups showed that 56% of all the patients had to wait longer than 9 months from the date surgery was recommended. Perceived waiting times for consultation were found to be 56.9% longer (p < 0.001) than the actual waiting times, but there was no significant difference between perceived and actual waiting times for surgery (p = 0.40). Fifty percent of the patients stated they were unhappy with the wait for surgery or found the wait unacceptable (56% of URB and 44% of RUR patients). There was no significant difference between RUR and URB in patients' acceptance of their wait for surgery (p = 0.09), but URB patients believed their wait for surgery made a greater contribution to health deterioration (p = 0.003). Thirty-eight percent of RUR and 54% of URB patients believed their surgical wait contributed to "a lot" or a "moderate" amount of deterioration in their health.ConclusionsWaiting times for hip or knee replacement surgery have increased to the point at which over 50% of surgical patients in 2000-2001 in RUR and URB orthopedic practices had waited longer than 9 months for surgery. In comparing these practices, there was a significantly longer wait in urban than rural practices for the initial consultation but no significant difference in waiting times for surgery.

17 keywords...

hide…