• Resp Care · Nov 2009

    Randomized Controlled Trial

    The addition of mechanical insufflation/exsufflation shortens airway-clearance sessions in neuromuscular patients with chest infection.

    • Michelle Chatwin and Anita K Simonds.
    • Academic and Clinical Department of Sleep and Breathing, Royal Brompton Hospital, Sydney Street, London, SW3 6NP, United Kingdom. m.chatwin@rbht.nhs.uk
    • Resp Care. 2009 Nov 1;54(11):1473-9.

    BackgroundMechanical insufflation/exsufflation (in-exsufflation) increases peak cough flow and may improve sputum clearance. No studies have compared current respiratory physiotherapy practice (manual percussion, shaking, and assisted cough) plus mechanical in-exsufflation to current physiotherapy practice without in-exsufflation in noninvasive-ventilation (NIV) dependent neuromuscular patients with an acute respiratory-tract infection. We hypothesized that airway clearance in these patients would be more effective with in-exsufflation, compared to without in-exsufflation.MethodsEight patients (6 male), median age 21.5 y (range 4-44 y). All had sputum retention, with an elevated C-reactive protein of 113 mg/L (range 13-231 mg/L) and a white-cell count of 14x10(9) cells/L (range 7-25x10(9) cells/L). Patients underwent a 2-day randomized crossover treatment program, with in-exsufflation for one session and without in-exsufflation for the second, with a reverse-crossover on the next day. Treatment time after 30 min (or earlier if sputum clearance was complete) was recorded. Outcome measures were heart rate, pulse oximetry (SpO2), transcutaneous carbon dioxide tension (PtcCO2), and independently assessed auscultation score. Patients rated effectiveness on a visual analog scale.ResultsTreatment time after 30 min was significantly shorter with in-exsufflation, versus without in-exsufflation session (30+0=30 min (range 0-26 min) vs 30+17=47 min (range 0-35 min) (P=.03). There was a significant improvement in auscultation score in both groups (with in-exsufflation 2.9+/-1.9 to 1.8+/-2.0, P=.02; without in-exsufflation 3.4+/-2.0 to 2.3+/-2.2, P=.007). Visual-analog-scale score for the amount of sputum cleared in both treatment groups showed a decline ( <.05). There was no difference in mean heart rate, SpO2, or PtcCO2 with either treatment.ConclusionsThis is a short-term study of the use of in-exsufflation as a supplement to standard NIV plus physiotherapy in a small group of patients with neuromuscular disease. The addition of mechanical in-exsufflation shortened airway-clearance sessions. The device appeared to be safe and well tolerated, and may provide additional benefit to patients with neuromuscular disease and upper-respiratory-tract infection; further studies are indicated.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.