• J Craniofac Surg · Nov 2013

    Comparative Study Controlled Clinical Trial

    Comparison between routine and improved decompressive craniectomy on patients with malignant cerebral artery infarction without traumatic brain injury.

    • Anwen Shao, Songxue Guo, Sheng Chen, Chongran Sun, Haijian Wu, Yuan Hong, and Jianmin Zhang.
    • From the Department of Neurosurgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China.
    • J Craniofac Surg. 2013 Nov 1;24(6):2085-8.

    BackgroundMalignant cerebral artery infarction is one kind of ischemic stroke with high mortality. The aim of this study was to analyze comparatively the preoperative and postoperative clinical data as well as the prognostic factors in these patients who underwent improved decompressive craniectomy or routine decompressive craniectomy.MethodsA total of 131 patients with malignant cerebral artery infarction were included during the period from January 2000 to December 2012. The patients were divided into 2 groups: the improved decompressive craniectomy group (n = 85) and the routine decompressive craniectomy group (control group) (n = 46). We reviewed the detailed information of the patients; moreover, a comparative analysis of the 2 groups based on age (≤ 60 or >60 y) was performed.ResultsThe improved decompressive craniectomy group had a significant decrease (P < 0.05) in mortality without clinical functional improvement. The patients who were treated through routine decompressive craniectomy had a higher incidence of hydrocephalus and pulmonary infection (P = 0.011 and 0.003). Moreover, younger patients usually took less resident time in the hospital than did the patients in the elderly group (P = 0.047 vs P < 0.05). Statistical results indicated that the younger patients took a better recovery than did the elderly patients. There was a significant difference between the groups A and B both in the Barthel index and the modified Rankine scale for 3 or 6 months after discharge (P < 0.05).ConclusionsIn comparison with the routine decompressive craniectomy, the improved decompressive craniectomy can reduce the mortality rate and improve the neurologic outcome. However, it increases the incidence of encephalocele and pulmonary infection, which may cause secondary vital injury to patients after surgery. In addition, younger patients can gain a better further functional recovery by undergoing improved decompressive craniectomy.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.