• Chest · Mar 2014

    Should postpneumonia chest imaging be routine practice?

    • Luke Surry and William Hannah.
    • Chest. 2014 Mar 1;145(3 Suppl):149A.

    Session TitleRespiratory Infections PostersSESSION TYPE: Poster PresentationsPRESENTED ON: Saturday, March 22, 2014 at 01:15 PM - 02:15 PMPURPOSE: Chest imaging 4-8 weeks following diagnosis of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a routine and historically recommended practice. There is insufficient data to support this practice and the most recent recommendations are mute on the subject. This study examines the real-world practice of chest imaging following CAP; the rate persistent radiographic abnormalities; and the association of persistent abnormalities with clinical risk factors and subsequent non-malignant and malignant pulmonary diseases.MethodsA retrospective chart-review of DOD electronic medical records dated 2005 to 2010 was completed. Patients aged 18-65 years with CAP-related ICD-9 coded events were included. From these events, a convenience cohort of 1667 patients was selected for preliminary review. After exclusion for inadequate follow-up, clear cases of HAP/VAP, and incorrect coding, 1455 cases were included in preliminary analysis. Imaging studies were broadly categorized as "normal" or "abnormal" at diagnosis and follow-up. Demographic data, smoking history, and prior pulmonary disease were documented along with post-pneumonia diagnoses of malignant and non-malignant pulmonary disease.ResultsOf 882 patients with abnormal initial imaging, only 464 (52%) completed reimaging at a median interval of 36 days. Persistent radiographic abnormalities were documented in 168 cases (36%) at median image interval of 27.5 days. New diagnoses of COPD or asthma were made in 10 cases (6%) with median follow-up of 39.4 months. New pulmonary malignancy was diagnosed in 6 cases (3.5%) at median follow-up of 45.8 months. In this group, only 1 patient diagnosed with pulmonary malignancy and 2 diagnosed with COPD or asthma were non-smokers.ConclusionsReimaging following diagnosis of pneumonia in this study population was inconsistently practiced. Persistent radiographic abnormalities were noted in approximately 1/3 of patients at follow-up, consistent with previous studies. Although infrequent, new non-malignant pulmonary disease was more common than pulmonary malignancy.Clinical ImplicationsPreliminary review supports discretionary reimaging with prognostic implications for long-term diagnosis of malignant and non-malignant pulmonary disease. Multivariate analysis is ongoing to clarify factors that may guide more judicious reimaging following CAP.DisclosureThe following authors have nothing to disclose: Luke Surry, Michael Morris, William HannahNo Product/Research Disclosure Information.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…